Cultural Geography

Fall 2004

Chapter 6:  ETHNIC GEOGRAPHY

 

Ethnic geography studies the spatial distributions and interactions of ethnic groups—populations distinguished by common origins and distinctive cultural or racial traits.

 

No such thing as an ethnically pure nation state

 

Guest Workers- Resident Aliens in Western Europe that have brought a great deal of ethnic variation into national life- 10% of labor force.

 

Middle Eastern countries- 60-90% of workforce is foreign (Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and UAE. 

Culture- traits of a human group- beliefs, symbols, values, behavior and complexes (social customs, language, religion, food, tools, structures, etc.)

Culture is learned

Ethnicity – identification of a large group of people sharing the traits of a culture

Ethnicity is a spatial concept; recognized homeland areas, urban enclaves, or rural settlement districts are the rule.

 

Territory and ethnicity are inseparable- related to culture (language and religion)

 

Ethnicity does not have a single trait- language, religion, national origin, customs or race.  Unifying bonds:

1.      Shared ancestry

2.      Cultural heritage

3.      Traditions

4.      Maintenance of in-group interactions/relationships

 

Most societies are multiethnic, with ethnic mixing increasingly common in response to migration and refugee flows into even formerly homogeneous societies and countries. Ethnocentrism is a feeling of one's own ethnic group superiority that tends to encourage isolation and to inhibit the amalgamation of complex societies.

 

Ethnic groups- cultural institutions and traditional food/music

 

Territorial isolation- assists groups retain identification

Ethnic minorities are associated with homelands

Ethnic Cleansing- mass genocide of a target population from a geographic region or political area.

 

US Homelands- Enclaves of spatial refuge and support systems- Chinatown  or Little Italy- product of self-selection not segregation.

 

Matter of Race

 

Race- hereditary, biological characteristics, greatest genetic variation between an group is less than within a given population.  Race is not equivalent to ethnicity or nationality

 

Ethnic distinctions may be based either on cultural or racial characteristics. The former involves acquired traits, the latter genetic differences. Genetic drift and adaptation may create distinctive heritable traits among separate populations. Those traits have nothing to do with language, religion, nationality, or other acquired characteristics.

 

Immigration Streams

 

Some societies, such as the Anglo American, are the product of multiethnic immigration and mixing. The origin areas of U.S. immigrant flows have changed from earlier European and African homelands to a recent strong prominence of Asian and Latin American nationals- all cultures and races of the world (70 million immigrants.)

 

US Immigration

 

First Wave- up to 1870, Western and Northern Europe (Germany and England)- Protestant, Anglo-Saxons and Africans- 20% of US population (1790)

Second Wave- (1870-1921) Eastern and Southern Europeans- 50% of new arrivals, immigration slows during Depression and WWII

Third Wave- 1960s. Latin America and Asia

 2002- 11.5% of US population (32.5 million)

1990s- illegal immigration- over 6 million

New York City- 40% of residents, foreign born

Parts of CA- 60% Asian

 

Canada- 1) up to 1760, French, 2) British and US Loyalists and 3) 20th century, Continental Europe and rest of world

 

Acculturation and Assimilation

 

US- No single, “majority” ethnic group exists- becoming state where no racial majority exists

 

The merger of different ethnic groups into a single social structure, if it occurs at all, may involve:

 

amalgamation—the creation of a composite mainstream society with merged characteristics

acculturation—adoption by new immigrant groups of the values and norms of a dominating host culture or charter group.

 

Assimilation- When integration is complete.

Behavioral- acculturation

Structural- fusion of immigrant within the host culture- groups, social systems and occupations (marriage, etc.) – residential segregation, intermarriage, political office, etc.

 

Competition Theory- ethnic awareness is heightened as groups entire mainstream life.- pressure to integrate actually focuses ethnic identity- forcing groups together

 

Amalgamation Theory, the idea of a melting pot, has recently fallen out of favor with some scholars as being unrealistic due to cultural tensions that exist in many societies.

 

Current trends- amalgamation is unrealistic given social and cultural tensions.  Retained/defended cultural identities are normal and militant multiculturalism is typical.  Homeland connections increase via- telecommunications (TV, cable, internet, movies, etc.)

 

2000 Census- 18% of Americans speak language other than English in home (60% of these speak Spanish)

 

US vs Canada- melting pot (acculturation/assimilation) vs multiculturalism (national policy that provides services based upon cultural background/language, etc.)

 

Areal Expressions of Ethnicity

 

Territoriality and ethnicity are associated and often disruptive.

Example- Soviet Union- freed 14 ethnic republics

 

Charter Cultures

 

First Effective Settlement- initial group to establish a viable, self-perpetuating society leaves a dominant imprint- US East Coast, Quebec

 

Charter Group- dominant first arrivals that establish cultural norms (English across US, Hispanic culture across Southwest)

 

Except for French Canadians and some Native Americans, Anglo America has no defined ethnic homeland areas. However, immigrant streams have created recognizable spatial ethnic patterns.

 

Ethnic provinces include larger racial or cultural concentrations, including those of French Canadians in Quebec, African Americans in the U.S. Southeast, Native Americans in the Southwest, the northern plains and Prairie Provinces, and in Northern Canada and Alaska, and Hispanics along the borderlands of the Southwest.

 

Ethnic islands reflect both rural and urban cluster and chain migration and take the form of distinctive rural landscapes and pronounced urban immigrant neighborhoods.  Quebec- 75% French descent with 80% of French-Canadian population

 

Cluster Migration- taking up large areas as a group

Chain Migration- accumulation of relatives, friends, etc through an initial contact

 

Black migration- African Americans first come as slaves and remained in rural south after emancipation.  Move north into factory towns during WW1 when European immigration is interrupted (Jazz develops).  During WWII and after this continues- 5 million blacks move to urban areas- 86% live in urban areas versus 75% of Americans overall

 

Hispanic- not a homogeneous group (term is defined by Census Bureau in 1980)- often difficult to identify (many consider themselves “white”)  Most rapidly growing monitory in US (57%- surpassed Africans Americans)  Mexican Americans are 60% of the Hispanic total. Urban- 91%

 

Issue- patterns of poverty, isolation and cultural alienation

 

Consider- Borderlands issues- large number of Mexican Americans with language, culture and religious differences with rest of US

 

New York City- largest Puerto Rican City

Florida (Miami and Dade County) – Cuban American center

 

Asian- 1.5 million (1965) to 12 million (2000.) First mostly Japanese and Chinese, now includes Korea, Philippines, Vietnam, India, Thailand and Pakistan- 1/3 of US immigration, 40% in west and 35% in California.  50% of Filipinos, 40% of Vietnamese.  96% of Asians are Urban

 

LA/Long Beach- largest Vietnamese community outside of Vietnam

 

Immigration pattern- 1) family reunification laws, educational privileges and then job/skill categories (chain migration), 2) Refugee resettlement (Southeast Asia)- after Vietnam war.

 

Immigrant Clusters- short-term immigrant clustering is more common than dispersals.

 

Urban Ethnic Diversity and Segregation

 

US immigrant neighborhoods have had a pronounced impact upon US cities- urban 20th century is a mosaic of ethnic enclave

 

The immigrant neighborhood is evidence of social distance between immigrant and charter groups.

 

It may reflect either self-elected defensive refuge or imposed segregation. When self-created and maintained, the ethnic community can ease the entry of new arrivals into mainstream society. When imposed by the majority group, the immigrant or racial ghetto perpetuates discord and separation

 

Assimilation Controls

 

External (attitudes held by the charter group)

Process when a charter group feels threatened by an immigrant group- results in blocking efforts to control or contain.  Tipping point- when immigrant group has taken up enough territory that the charter group leaves the enclave- exodus- “White Flight” in urban America

Expressions- immigrants relegated to worst housing and low end of occupational structure

 

Internal (group cohesiveness and defensives)

Principal Functions:

·        Defense- reduces isolation, exclusive domains, defined ethnic territories against antagonistic immigrant groups

·        Support- provides culture of home

·        Preservation- preserves and promotes cultural heritage (religion, language, etc.)

·        Attack- political power

 

Ethnic communities are not permanent

Ethnoburb- enduring social/political area within a city.

Colony- entry point for members of a community into the new country

Enclave- neighborhood

 

Cultural Transfer

 

New groups bring culture with them- food, dress, building styles, furniture, marriage customs, religion, etc.  Some of this impacts charter group, depending upon:

 

  1. Background of arriving group
  2. Social distance from charter group
  3. Disparity between new home and origin- area environmental conditions
  4. Importance given by immigrants to economic, political or religious reasons to move
  5. Encountered constraints forcing personal, social or technical adjustments

 

Ethnic Landscapes

 

Cultural geographers are interested in landscape evidence of ethnicity. It may take such variant forms as differing house or building styles, settlement patterns, land survey systems, or styles and manners of dress and customary behavior. In all world regions, including Anglo America, such landscape contrasts help document the essential spatial aspect of ethnicity.